Former Police Director Admits Guilt in Corruption Case

Former police director Slavko Stojanović expressed profound remorse for his actions during a hearing at the Appeals Court in Montenegro on March 15, 2024. Stojanović, convicted earlier this year, is currently appealing his sentence of three years and eight months in prison for abuse of office. He admitted to using his official position to allow a truck loaded with cigarettes to bypass the necessary documentation checks.

During the proceedings, Stojanović acknowledged that he misled his colleagues into believing the truck was under covert surveillance by the Special Prosecutor’s Office. He claimed that his intention was to protect a police operation, although he denied knowing the truck carried illicit cigarettes.

The case against Stojanović stems from allegations that he permitted the truck, which was transporting approximately 120 packages of cigarettes, to continue its journey without appropriate documentation and also faced charges related to illegal possession of firearms. The Special Prosecutor’s Office argues that his actions created a climate of distrust towards state institutions.

In the appeal, the prosecutor emphasized that Stojanović’s punishment was insufficient considering the gravity of his actions as a public official. They noted that his conduct not only violated legal standards but also harmed public confidence in law enforcement. The prosecution further highlighted Stojanović’s continued protection of the identity of the friend he assisted, suggesting he prioritized personal interests over his public duties.

On the defense side, attorney Miroslav Adžić contested the court’s assertion regarding the quantity of cigarettes involved, pointing out the ambiguity in the original judgment that described the load as “around 120 packages.” Adžić argued that clarity on the exact quantity could significantly alter the assessment of damages to the state budget, particularly since the cigarettes in question were subject to tax exemptions.

Adžić also raised concerns about the initial court’s failure to adequately consider mitigating circumstances in Stojanović’s case. These included his status as a family man of advanced age, his previous clean record, and his admission of guilt. Stojanović explained that he made irrational decisions during a period marked by professional and moral pressures due to a complex security situation, which included unprevented homicides that had deeply affected him.

The case has drawn attention not only for its implications on Stojanović’s career but also for its broader impact on public trust in law enforcement in Montenegro. As legal proceedings continue, the outcomes may influence discussions around accountability and transparency within government agencies.