Connect with us

Business

Emefiele’s $4.5 Billion Fraud Trial Faces Delay Over Forensic Issues

Editorial

Published

on

The trial of former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Godwin Emefiele, which involves allegations of fraud totalling $4.5 billion, has encountered significant delays due to unresolved issues surrounding the forensic examination of an iPhone. This examination is considered critical for the ongoing case against Emefiele and his co-defendant, Henry Omoile. The trial resumed at the Ikeja Special Offences Court in Lagos, where complications arose over a court order for a joint forensic analysis.

During the hearing before Justice Rahman Oshodi, defence counsel Olalekan Ojo, SAN, informed the court that the scheduled forensic examination was unable to proceed as planned. The analysis was meant to be conducted by forensic experts from both the defence and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). However, disagreements regarding compliance with the court order have stalled the process.

Ojo claimed that the EFCC obstructed the examination, which was initially set for September 24 and 25, 2025. He stated that representatives from both sides, along with the court registrar, attended the examination; however, it was aborted after the EFCC allegedly restricted access to the device. “The first brick wall we faced was that the EFCC said the device could not be exposed to the entire team,” Ojo explained. He further noted that even after the registrar clarified the order, the EFCC representatives refused to produce the iPhone for examination.

In response, EFCC counsel Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, argued that the defence’s initial forensic attempt was flawed and did not adhere to established forensic standards. Oyedepo raised concerns that the defence expert lacked a proper laboratory and conducted parts of the analysis online, which he claimed compromised the integrity of the data. “The implication of their request is that Exhibit E (iPhone) may be altered,” he argued, asserting that the device remains in flight mode to protect its contents.

The defence team urged the court to suspend further witness testimonies until the forensic examination could be completed. They argued that the WhatsApp conversations contained within the device are crucial for their case. In a ruling, Justice Oshodi acknowledged the defence’s concerns and ordered the prosecution to file its forensic report within 24 hours. Despite this, he allowed the prosecution to continue calling witnesses, noting the travel arrangements made by the current witness.

The prosecution’s next witness, Mr. Alvan Gurumnaan, an operative with the EFCC, testified about cash deliveries allegedly made to Emefiele and his associates. He indicated that the investigation involved interrogating staff from the CBN, Zenith Bank, and other financial institutions linked to the alleged fraudulent transactions. Gurumnaan presented several WhatsApp exchanges as exhibits, purportedly documenting foreign currency transfers conducted through intermediaries.

Justice Oshodi has adjourned the case to October 8 and 9, 2025, allowing for the continuation of the trial. Emefiele faces 19 counts related to corruption and abuse of office, while Omoile is charged with three counts involving the illegal acceptance of gifts. Both defendants have pleaded not guilty. The ongoing complications in the trial reflect broader issues of compliance and cooperation between the EFCC and the defence, which may impact the progression of this high-profile case.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.