Connect with us

Politics

Prince Andrew Demands Royal Treatment Despite Title Loss

Editorial

Published

on

Prince Andrew continues to seek royal treatment within the walls of Royal Lodge, despite being stripped of his title as Duke of York on October 17, 2025. Reports indicate that staff at his Windsor residence still address him as “His Royal Highness” and bow to him, raising questions about adherence to royal protocol in light of his controversial past. This situation unfolds against a backdrop of ongoing scrutiny related to his connections with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

According to sources cited by Rob Shuter’s #ShuterScoop, the atmosphere at Royal Lodge has not changed significantly since the title removal. One insider remarked, “The butler still says Your Royal Highness, and the staff still bow,” suggesting that Andrew firmly believes that palace rules do not apply in his private residence. Buckingham Palace confirmed the removal of Andrew’s title in an official statement, which noted that the decision was made in consultation with King Charles III and the broader royal family.

In his statement from October 17, Andrew declared, “I will therefore no longer use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me.” Despite this, he reportedly considers his royal status a “birthright.” Sources close to the prince assert that he continues to issue directives at home as though his royal identity remains intact. “It’s not something the King can erase,” one insider told RadarOnline, indicating that Andrew’s perception of his royal identity is unyielding.

The prince’s insistence on maintaining a royal demeanor at home has garnered criticism, especially in light of the serious allegations that have tarnished his reputation. His association with Epstein and the civil sexual abuse case brought by Virginia Giuffre have significantly impacted his public image. Following these events, King Charles reportedly reached a “tipping point” regarding Andrew’s ongoing scandals, prompting the decision to strip him of his titles.

According to Lawyer Monthly, the palace viewed the fallout from the Epstein scandal as a distraction from the monarchy’s public duties, leading to Andrew’s official removal from royal honours. While Andrew retains the title of prince by birth, he no longer holds the peerage title of Duke of York, which was originally granted to him by Queen Elizabeth II in 1986. His royal duties had already been significantly reduced following a disastrous interview in 2016 and increasing legal pressures in 2022.

One source described Andrew’s situation as living in “his own royal bubble,” highlighting the disparity between his public downfall and private behavior. “To the world, he’s a fallen prince — but in his home, he’s still the Duke.” This comment underscores a troubling disconnect between Andrew’s standing and his actions, fueling criticism regarding his refusal to accept the consequences of his past.

The prince’s insistence on continuing royal protocol at home has renewed discussions about the accountability of the monarchy and the boundaries of privilege. As the Epstein scandal continues to resonate, Andrew’s behavior behind closed doors may further undermine public trust in the institution. The ongoing scrutiny of his actions serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by the royal family in maintaining its image and credibility in the eyes of the public.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.