Darko Šuković Discusses Media and Legal Controversies in Montenegro

Darko Šuković, editor of Antena M, spoke on the television program “Club A+” hosted by Meli Ramusović, addressing recent actions taken by Montenegro’s Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SDT). The SDT has implicated certain media outlets and government critics as being under the influence of businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović, who reportedly leads a criminal network alleged to engage in abuse of position, leaking confidential information, and exerting political influence.

Šuković noted that he has not been summoned by the SDT for questioning as a witness. He stated, “Everything I could possibly know about myself, I do not expect to find at the SDT, but rather on the platforms of a media house.” He mentioned that two journalists will be questioned as witnesses, and he could potentially be included among the “others” referenced. To date, he has not received any communication from the SDT.

When asked why some members of the public are not surprised by these developments, Šuković remarked on the reactions he has observed, which he would not classify as shock. “I think part of the public is even pleased that this group of media is under the scrutiny of the SDT,” he commented.

In his discussions with the acting director of the police, Šuković emphasized that their conversations were strictly professional. He explained, “I call the director to verify information. There is nothing that would compromise us publicly.” He asserted that if these discussions were published, even as mere questions or answers, some members of the public would likely attempt to draw connections and suggest influence.

Šuković highlighted a fundamental issue regarding the presumption of innocence. He argued that the public should not have access to private correspondence between him and Mijajlović, even if it included provocative examples. “Even if Mijajlović and I were to exchange messages about delivering cocaine to the top of Gorica, the public has no right to know while the case is still in the processing phase,” he stated. He maintained that the public should only be informed once the indictment is confirmed and a hearing is scheduled.

He criticized the media outlets that published the correspondence, arguing that they favor one side over another, which undermines the media’s purpose. According to Šuković, the SDT appears to favor specific media, influencing public perception before the legal process even begins, effectively passing judgment before charges are formally laid.

In response to a question regarding a construction company owner later prosecuted for tobacco smuggling, Šuković explained that he had frequent communications with this individual across various topics, from sports to politics. He emphasized that their advertising agreement with Antena M is transparent and of a value that does not equate to the purchase of an entire media outlet.

He stated, “There is nothing unusual about discussing a text and when to publish it.” He acknowledged that the final decision on what will be included in an article and when it will be released rests solely with him.

The gravest accusations within the SDT’s order include agreements concerning graffiti in Rožaje that threaten the Bosniak community. Šuković asserted that if proven true, those involved should face severe penalties, stating, “It is a matter of intelligence and principle. I cannot comprehend how a normal person would come up with such an idea in Montenegro, which is already overwhelmed with the worst messages and threats.”

He further addressed those feigning shock, referencing recent events in Pljevlja where Bosniaks were threatened during their visit to vote. “Those who were the main media sponsors of such forces, who witnessed all these acts without speaking out, should remain silent,” he said, criticizing the hypocrisy of those claiming moral outrage.

The discussion also touched on the unresolved murder of Duško Jovanović. Šuković expressed that while the media generally handles the topic correctly, there are problematic aspects in how it is reported. He described the silence surrounding the issue as a burden on the public, likening it to a millstone. He asserted that the unresolved nature of the murder could be more detrimental than the manner in which it is politically and journalistically exploited.

In commenting on the messages from international partners, Šuković emphasized that media freedom and the fight against crime are vital allies in maintaining integrity. He critiqued the actions of U.S. Ambassador Judy Rising Reinke, suggesting her policies contradict the values the United States promotes. “Her approach is the antithesis of what the U.S. stands for,” he stated, reiterating his long-standing criticisms of both the EU and U.S.

Šuković also addressed the misogynistic attacks against the ambassador, clarifying that his criticisms were focused on her work and policies, rather than her appearance.

During the program, he remarked that media and political parties should not accept funding derived from criminal activities. He reiterated that media freedom is crucial in the battle against organized crime, aligning with statements made by U.S. officials regarding the same subject.

He expressed concern over the use of social networks and the presence of bots, claiming that the army of bots from Belgrade is larger than that of Miloš Nikolić. He cautioned that those in public roles must be prepared to face criticism and rejected the notion that the state should support substandard journalism that could lead to serious societal issues in the future.