Connect with us

Politics

Ice Cream removed from School Menus Sparking Industry Outcry

Editorial

Published

on

The owner of Davison’s Ice Cream has publicly criticized the decision by the government to remove ice cream from primary school menus. This change is part of a broader overhaul of school meals, which will take effect in the 2025/26 academic year. The Department of Education, Sport and Culture (DESC) announced that the new menus aim to significantly increase the amount of fresh, locally sourced produce while reducing the prevalence of ultra-processed foods (UPF).

Under the new guidelines, the share of UPF in school meals will decline from 51.5% in the previous academic year to just 5.3% this year. In contrast, the use of locally sourced ingredients has surged from 6.2% to nearly 25%. These metrics were derived using the internationally recognized NOVA scale, which categorizes foods based on their processing levels.

Thousands of students across the island’s 31 primary schools will experience immediate changes to their lunches. New menu options include dishes such as sweet potato and coconut curry, roast Manx pork, and freshly prepared pasta bakes, with expanded salad selections. Traditional desserts, including ice cream and sponge puddings, will largely be replaced by fruit and whole Manx milk.

Greig Davison, owner of Davison’s Ice Cream, expressed his disappointment with the decision in a post on Facebook. He questioned the classification of ice cream as an ultra-processed food, suggesting that the criteria unfairly penalize products that undergo necessary processes, such as pasteurization and freezing.

“So I wonder how many MHKs will now stop eating our ice cream after they voted to remove it from the new school menus (where it’s been an option for 15+ years) and have now deemed it as an ultra-high processed food,” he stated. Davison highlighted that his ice cream contains over 70% milk and cream and is relatively low in sugar compared to other sweets.

He noted that schools use approximately 6,000 litres of ice cream annually, asserting that removing such options could lead to hungry children. “Good luck teachers as I know what my two are like when they’re hangry,” he added, reflecting on the potential impact on students.

In defense of the changes, Daphne Caine MHK, the Education Minister, emphasized that the new menu is designed to promote long-term health for students. “We are pleased to offer this menu, which gives children the healthy start they deserve,” she stated. Caine explained that the reduction in ultra-processed foods supports healthier eating habits and contributes to better overall health outcomes for children.

The new meal options will continue to be prepared on the island, thereby supporting local jobs and reducing the carbon footprint associated with food transportation. Schools will also monitor food waste to ensure ongoing improvements in menu offerings.

The price for school meals will remain at £2.55, with free meals available for eligible families. Approximately 3,100 meals are served each weekday across the island’s primary schools, ensuring that students have access to nutritious options.

As the new menus roll out, the debate around food processing and child nutrition continues to unfold, highlighting the complexities of balancing health guidelines with local industry interests.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.