Connect with us

Health

New Study Reveals Nontraditional Causes of Heart Attacks in Women Under 65

Editorial

Published

on

Research from the **Mayo Clinic** has found that many heart attacks in individuals under the age of 65, particularly women, are often triggered by factors unrelated to clogged arteries. This groundbreaking study, published in the **Journal of the American College of Cardiology**, challenges traditional views on the causes of heart attacks among younger populations.

The study analyzed over **15 years** of data from the **Rochester Epidemiology Project**. Researchers discovered that more than half of heart attacks in women under 65 stemmed from nontraditional sources, such as **spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)** and other conditions not linked to plaque buildup. This research provides the most comprehensive evaluation of heart attack causes in this age group to date.

Key Findings and Implications

While heart attack rates were lower in women than in men, the underlying causes in women were frequently misdiagnosed. SCAD, which predominantly affects younger, otherwise healthy women, was often mistaken for a typical heart attack caused by artery-clogging plaque. In fact, **47%** of heart attacks in women were attributed to atherosclerosis, compared to **75%** in men.

The study also revealed that heart attacks triggered by stressors, such as **anemia** or **infection**, were the second most common cause overall and had the highest five-year mortality rate of **33%**. This highlights the need for greater awareness and understanding of heart attack triggers that have historically gone unrecognized, especially among women.

Dr. **Claire Raphael**, interventional cardiologist at **Mayo Clinic** and the study’s first author, emphasized the importance of accurate diagnosis. “When the root cause of a heart attack is misunderstood, it can lead to treatments that are less effective—or even harmful,” she noted. Misdiagnosis of SCAD could result in unnecessary treatments, such as stent placements, which may increase the risk of complications.

Rethinking Heart Attack Diagnosis

The research underscores the necessity for healthcare professionals to reconsider their approach to diagnosing heart attacks in younger adults, particularly women. Dr. **Rajiv Gulati**, chair of the Division of Interventional Cardiology and Ischemic Heart Disease at Mayo Clinic, stated, “Clinicians must sharpen their awareness of conditions like SCAD, embolism, and stress-related triggers.” He urged patients to advocate for thorough investigations when they experience unusual symptoms.

The study also found that out of **1,474** heart attack cases, **68%** were due to typical plaque buildup, but nontraditional causes were significantly more prevalent in women. Notably, SCAD was nearly six times more common in women than men. The research concluded that unexplained heart attacks were rare, constituting less than **3%** of cases after expert review.

Understanding the causes of heart attacks is crucial, as it directly impacts treatment and recovery. “Understanding why a heart attack happened is just as important as treating it,” Dr. Raphael reiterated. “It can mean the difference between recovery and recurrence.”

This comprehensive study not only sheds light on the complex nature of heart attacks in younger populations but also opens the door for improved diagnostic practices and ultimately, better patient outcomes.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.