‘Benefits Queen’ Cheryl Drew Challenges DWP’s Two-Child Cap

Cheryl Drew, known as the UK’s “benefit queen,” has publicly expressed her disagreement with a proposed rule change by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that seeks to scrap the two-child benefit cap. Previously able to claim approximately £60,000 annually for her 15 children, Drew now identifies as a tax-paying entrepreneur and advocates against handouts.

The controversy arises as the Labour Party, led by Rachel Reeves, plans to eliminate the two-child cap on benefits. Drew, 43, has voiced strong opposition to this initiative. She stated, “I can’t believe what Rachel Reeves has done. She’s going backwards, not moving mums forwards.” Her remarks highlight a belief that financial assistance should not foster dependency but rather encourage self-sufficiency.

During a recent interview with The Sun, Drew emphasized her journey from relying on benefits to becoming financially independent. Despite receiving government support, she supplemented her income with part-time work as a cleaner, dedicating 16 hours a week. Her experience, she claims, was pivotal in shaping her resilience and work ethic.

The benefits cap, according to Drew, played a significant role in motivating her to seek employment and create a stable life for her children. She stated, “It’s been the making of me. I want what I’ve had for other women.” As Drew transitioned into entrepreneurship, she and her husband launched a mobile laser tattoo removal business during the Covid pandemic.

Friends of Drew have noted her transformation and pride in her achievements. One close acquaintance remarked, “It’s clear Cheryl is finally proud of herself and so she should be.” They expressed that Drew’s success can inspire other mothers facing similar challenges.

Drew’s frustration extends to the government’s approach to welfare. She argued that increasing benefits for families with more children could undermine the motivation for mothers to seek employment. “That’s not going to happen if the Government makes them richer by staying at home to have more babies. It’s not fair because these decisions can make or break lives,” she asserted.

In a society where many rely on government support, Drew acknowledges the importance of welfare programs. “I think she’d be the last person to say she’s anti-benefits — they serve an important purpose. She knows there are lots of mums out there with no option,” a friend stated.

Drew’s story serves as a compelling example of personal growth and the complexities surrounding welfare in the UK. Her journey from dependency to entrepreneurship highlights the potential for individuals to overcome challenges, emphasizing the need for policies that empower rather than discourage self-reliance.