Connect with us

Science

University of Michigan Reassesses Controversial Data Center Plans

Editorial

Published

on

The University of Michigan is re-evaluating the location for its proposed data center campus, a project estimated to cost $1.2 billion. This facility, which aims to advance research in artificial intelligence, energy, and national security, has faced significant local opposition and concerns over its environmental impact. University officials confirmed they are negotiating potential sites, including a location near the American Center for Mobility, west of Willow Run Airport, while still favoring a site off Textile Road.

The planned campus consists of two buildings: one designated for classified government research and another for non-classified projects. The university has maintained that the Textile Road site is preferable due to its existing light industrial zoning and infrastructure. Chris Kolb, the university’s vice president for government relations, stated that preliminary plans would maximize distance from nearby parks and protect natural features, including the Huron River.

Despite these reassurances, tensions have escalated within the community. Township attorney Doug Winters expressed frustration at a recent Board of Trustees meeting, revealing that the university had been negotiating with the American Center for Mobility for over a year without informing township officials. He criticized the university for what he termed a “bait and switch” regarding the project’s location.

The township board has voiced strong opposition to the Textile Road site, citing concerns over environmental, health, and safety issues. They passed a resolution unanimously against the proposed location, with officials emphasizing the detrimental effects on local residents and businesses. Winters mentioned that the township has limited authority to intervene, as the university is exempt from local zoning regulations.

Local residents have also expressed fears about the implications of classified government research. During a recent township meeting, some called for broader opposition to any data center within the area. Township Supervisor Brenda Stumbo suggested that the former General Motors site might be more appropriate for such a facility, given its industrial history.

In response to these ongoing discussions, the township board has taken several proactive measures. They voted to hire environmental attorney Grant Trigger to assist with potential negotiations and to analyze environmental reviews should the university continue pursuing the Textile Road site. The board also authorized their legal counsel to prepare for possible actions if the university opts to advance its plans at the Textile Road location.

Furthermore, the planning commission is being directed to consider amending local zoning ordinances to restrict where future data centers can be established. Currently, data centers are permissible in areas designated for industrial and commercial revitalization, as well as logistics and manufacturing. The proposed amendments could limit data centers to only ICR-zoned land, which is closer to existing utilities.

The university and the national laboratory aim to have the data center campus operational by 2030, with construction slated to commence in 2026. As negotiations continue, the university remains committed to engaging with township officials and the community to address concerns surrounding the project.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.