Connect with us

Business

Trump Transforms Government Role with $11B Intel Stake Acquisition

Editorial

Published

on

US President Donald Trump is making significant changes to the government’s approach to private enterprise, particularly in sectors deemed critical to national security. Recently, his administration secured a nearly $11 billion (£8.1 billion) equity stake in chipmaker Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) through grants from the Chips Act. This move marks a pivotal shift in how the government engages with major corporations.

Details of the Intel Deal

The US government converted these grants into a 10% equity stake in Intel, a decision bolstered by a stock price increase of over 25% since the announcement. In late August, Trump defended his administration’s aggressive industrial policy, stating, “You have stupid people say, ‘That’s a shame.’ It’s not a shame, that’s called business.”

Facilitating this landmark deal was Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who emphasized the importance of securing returns on government grants. He argued that it is a mistake to provide financial support without obtaining equity in return.

Future Plans and Impacts

The US Defense Department is also taking steps to solidify its position in strategic industries. In July 2023, it intervened in MP Materials (NYSE: MP), the largest rare earth producer in the US, by purchasing $400 million (£297.7 million) worth of shares, making the government the largest shareholder. The CEO of MP Materials described this arrangement as a “public-private partnership,” which differs from the Intel agreement. Following this news, the company’s stock price nearly doubled.

Next on Trump’s agenda is acquiring a 10% stake in Lithium Americas (NYSE: LAC), a US-based lithium producer. Reports from late last week indicated that the Trump administration is renegotiating a $2.2 billion (£1.6 billion) government loan related to the Thacker Pass project, which aims to be one of the largest lithium sources by 2028. Trump is advocating for General Motors to relinquish some project control to the federal government, emphasizing the strategic importance of lithium resources in the electric vehicle supply chain.

General Motors has characterized the loan as essential for financing the commercialization of this national resource and noted that Trump had previously supported the project during his first term.

Potential Stake in Defence Contractors

Trump’s administration is also eyeing investments in defense contractors, particularly Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT). Lutnick stated that firms like Lockheed Martin operate closely with the US government, noting that approximately 97% of their revenue comes from government contracts. Despite the interest, Lutnick cautioned that any deal with Lockheed Martin is not yet finalized. The company’s shares have seen an increase of over 7% in the past month.

The Trump administration’s push for equity stakes in key industries reflects a broader strategy to intertwine government support with private sector growth, especially in sectors deemed vital for national security. As these initiatives unfold, their long-term impact on both the economy and corporate governance will be closely monitored.

“There’s a monstrous discussion about defense,” Lutnick stated, highlighting the critical nature of these investments.

As these developments continue to evolve, stakeholders are advised to conduct thorough analyses or consult professional advice before making any investment decisions, as market conditions remain volatile.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.